Warning: strtotime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 56

Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 198
Court Cases

2001 - 2011

Article Index
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
All Pages

Arbitration case

 

JSC «V» took legal action against JSC «Managing Company of Zheleznodorojny city district» with a statement of claim concerning debt collection for delivered heat energy. Interests of JSC «V» were represented by the specialists of ELC «Paritet». In the trial specialists of the Center presented documents proving lawfulness and relevance of submitted charges. As a result of work done by employees of the Center, the defendant acknowledged the claim and discharged the indebtedness in full volume in the course of the trial. The arbitration court stopped proceeding on the case due to the fact that the defendant acknowledged the claim. LLC «К» took legal action against LLC «S» with a statement of claim concerning debt collection, recovery of penalty and interests amount under contract agreement for using money means not belonging to the company. The claim, the statement of claim were drafted and the interests of LLC «К» as a principal in the Arbitration Court of Voronezh Region were represented by a specialist of ELC «Paritet». In the course of work the employees of the Center collected and obtained necessary job completion reports, reconciliation statements, inquiries and other written evidences, proving the presence and the amount of indebtedness, penalty and interests for using the money means not belonging to the company. By judgement of the Arbitration Court plaintiff's claims of LLC «К» were answered in corpore. LLC «М» applied to court with a suit against IE «S» concerning an amount of unjust enrichment, interests for using money means not belonging to the company, compelling to vacate occupied nonresidential premises, used by IE for entrepreneurial activity. The interests of IE «S» were represented by specialists of LLC «ELC «Paritet». In the course of work specialists of ELC prepared and directed a statement of defense to the Arbitration Court of Voronezh Region, obtained and collected necessary documents, formed and supplied evidence, proving the fact of absence of defender’s unjust enrichment. By judgement of the Arbitration Court a case of LLC «М» was dismissed. The Nineteen’s Arbitration Court of Appeal left the above-stated judgement without alterations and the appeal of LLC «М» - not granted.

 

Civil case

 

«LLC «Paritet»» received an appeal from P.N.P. – a buyer in contract for purchase of estate and dwelling house from U.A.V. – for drafting a statement of claim on the issue of withdrawal of encumbrance (mortgage by effect of law) juridically in view of seller’s refusal to solve the issue voluntary. In the course of case preparation for trial an employee of ELC «Paritet» directed to U.A.V. a written claim with a request to withdraw an encumbrance voluntarily, in case of his refusal – by judicial procedure. After receiving a written claim U.A.V. voluntarily performed all lawful actions in order to withdraw the encumbrance. Administration of urban district of Voronezh went to the law with an suit against «С», including in favour of «М», «Zh», including in favour of «А» concerning denunciation of social rent contract of a dwelling house (a flat in the house, which in plaintiff’s opinion is under the threat of collapse), eviction and moving into another dwelling house as per social rent contract. Interests of defendant «С», including in favour of «М» were presented by specialists of LLC «Paritet» who prepared and presented to court a notice of opposition against a statement of claim, and obtained necessary documents. In the course of trial a specialist of LLC «Paritet» proved that declared plaintiff’s claims to defendants are not justified and do not comply with acting legislation: there are no documents, proving the house to be under the threat of collapse and accordingly there is no basis for enunciation of social rent contract and eviction and moving tenants into another housing with worse living conditions and smaller living area. By judgement of the Court the suit was dismissed.

Members of the Voluntary Society for Gardeners "P", "B" and "C" applied to the LLC "EOC" Parity "" with a request of legal assistance to protect their legitimate rights and interests that threaten the established in breach of the law partnership of nonprofit horticultural m "P ". Experts of the center have been prepared and filed in court to claim for annulment of SNT SNT Charter "P" and redemption in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. Plaintiffs represented by experts of the center, who collected and submitted to the court all the objective evidence of the validity of claims of plaintiffs. A review of the court had been fully satisfied the claims of members of the community gardeners.

 

Criminal case

 

«LLC «Paritet»» received an appeal from S.N.I. – a complainant in criminal case, commenced against P.V.B. upon attempted rape of S.N.I. Interests of S.N.I. were presented by a barrister of LLC «Paritet». As a result of evidence collection and filing corresponding applications in the course of trial the barrister proved the accused guilty in attempted rape of S.N.I. By the sentence of Liskinskiy district court the accused was found guilty of the completed offence, compensation for moral injury was levied in favour of S.N.I.