Warning: strtotime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 56

Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 198
Court Cases

2001 - 2003

Article Index
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
All Pages

Civil case

 

P.I.A. addressed to Khokholskiy disctrict court with a statement of claim concerning the partition of jointly acquired property in equal parts. A representative of the Economic and Law Center «Paritet» appeared at the side of the plaintiff. In the process of the preparation of the case to the trial the attorney submitted requests to the corresponding state and private organizations to prove the right of the plaintiff for the above-mentioned property and its actual cost. While passing judgement Khokholskiy disctrict court allowed for the position of the plaintiff’s representative and decided to satisfy her claims in full volume.

 

Arbitration case

 

A statement of claim of LLC «Z» to LLC «M» concerning collection of debts in rental payment was reviewed in the Arbitrary court of Voronezh region. A representative of the Economic and Law Center «Paritet» appeared at the side of the defendant. He proved that LLC «Z» incorrectly defined the size of rented area; did not provide the defendant’s agreement to the change of rental payment; incorrectly used the method of calculation of rental payment. The court refused to satisfy plaintiff's claims quoting proofs collected by the representative of our Centre.

 

Criminal case

 

A criminal suit concerning the fact of bribetaking was filed against L.V.I. (citizen). To protect his interests L.V.I. addressed to the attorney of the Centre. Basing on attorney’s claims there were held prosecutor's investigations on the fact of using impermissible methods in the course of investigation-operational procedures. In the course of checks significant violations of acting legislation were found in the process of case investigation. As at result the prosecutor of Voronezh region passed a resolution about dismissing a criminal case as there is no corpus delicti in the actions of L.V.I.