Warning: strtotime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 56

Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 198
Court Cases

2001 - 2005

Article Index
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
All Pages

Civil case

 

Sh.A.B. addressed to a court with a suit concerning declaration of proprietary right and an object of carry-over construction. The specialists of «Paritet» centre acted in behalf of the plaintiff. In the course of trial by presenting proofs and statements our specialists managed to prove that there are grounds for termination of right for joint shared property for ground area and acknowledgement of the right for an object of carry-over construction. Ramonskiy district court of Voronezh region agreed with the conclusions of the plaintiff’s representatives and made a decision to satisfy his claims in full volume.

 

Arbitration case

 

LLC «М» addresses to the Arbitration court of Lipetsk district with a suit against LLC «D» concerning recovery of debts as per contract of carriage. A specialist of ELC «Paritet» acted in behalf of the plaintiff, in the course of case preparation by forwarding a claim to the defendant as well as while examining the merits of the civil case proved that LLC «М» properly executed it’s duties and LLC «D» was obliged to pay for the carriage services which was performed partially. The Arbitration court of Lipetsk region agreed with the conclusions and presented proofs of the plaintiff and satisfied plaintiff's claim in full volume.

 

Criminal case

 

B.Yu.A. addressed to ELC «Paritet», she was suspected in committing illegal tax refund from budget. As a result of attorney’s actions it was determined that the investigator committed procedural infractions, notably: B.Yu.A. was questioned without a defender, the questioning was performed according to the corresponding rules, the grounds for detention were not mentioned in the protocol, the rights of the suspect were not respected as were. On the basis of the case materials the attorney proved that actions performed by B.Yu.A., do not form corpus delicti in tax crime as in this case only the head of the organization or another authorized representative can be a subject of the crime being solely responsible for presenting tax returns, and B.Yu.A. is neither of them. The criminal case was dismissed.