Warning: strtotime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 56

Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 198
Court Cases

2001 - 2007

Article Index
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
All Pages

Civil case

 

In the interest of Sh., the plaintiff, for trial in the Levoberezhnyi court of Voronezh concerning recognition of property rights to the apartment, our specialist worked out tactics which helped to recognize the right of the plaintiff to own the disputed property. In its decision the court considered the arguments of specialist from Economic and Law Center «Paritet», in particular the fact that the defendant had not acquired a legal basis for the emergence of property rights to the apartment due to breach of contract housing with the labor participation of citizens and had no right to register right of property.

 

Arbitration case

 

Case number A14-9603/2007-446/24 concerning invalidation of the order of Federal tax agency's inspectorate about prosecuting INC «B» for tax violations. The specialists of Economic and Law Center «Paritet» revealed an infringement of the decision-making procedure on basis of tax audit, which served as a ground for the Nineteen Appeals Court of Arbitration to declare the order nonconforming to the norms of Section 2, Article. 153 of the Tax Code.

 

Criminal case

 

Criminal case against Ch.K.Sh., a citizen of India, on a charge of committing a crime under part 1 of article 188 of the Criminal Code. As a result of commission actions of our lawyers to establish the factual circumstances of the case and careful selection of evidence it was proved that the actions of CH.K.SH. contained no elements of corpus delicti. The investigator took these circumstances into account and on the basis of Art. 24 of the Code made the decision not to institute criminal proceedings in the absence of corpus delicti in the deeds of Ch.K.Sh.