Warning: strtotime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 56

Warning: date(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone. in /var/www/paritet/data/www/paritetcenter.ru/libraries/joomla/utilities/date.php on line 198
Court Cases

2001 - 2009

Article Index
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
All Pages

Civil case

 

M.I.G addressed to the Central District Court of Voronezh with a claim to the Territorial Directorate of Federal Agency for Management of State Property in the Voronezh region, Central Bank of the Russian Federation, Territorial Directorate of Federal Agency for Management of State Property concerning recognition of ownership of immovable property by way of privatization. Representative of the plaintiff from the Economic and Law Center «Paritet» sent requests to various government agencies, their responses confirmed an absolute title of the plaintiff. Central District Court of Voronezh, having evaluated and examined the evidence, decided to recognize M.I.G’s. title of the apartment by way of privatization.

 

Arbitration case

 

GUGI filed claims against Company «K» concerning termination of the rental agreement and eviction due to delayed payment and partial payment of rent. A specialist from Economic and Law Center «Paritet» proved that the debt, which is indicated by the plaintiff was unreasonably determined, without proper grounds, the plaintiff did not provide any evidence of delay in payment partial payment; there was also no significant breach of the contract which means there was no reasons for for termination of the lease and eviction of LLC «К» . The Nineteenth Arbitration Appeal Court decided to dismiss the claims.

 

Criminal case

 

The criminal case was filed on the grounds of crimes under Art. 159 and 195 of the Criminal Code against K.A.G. To protect his interests K.A.G. addressed to the experts of Center «Paritet»; as a result of investigations of the case they provided evidence of absence of fault in the actions of K.A.G. The conclusions of the investigator about K.A.G.’s guilt in committing a crime under Art. 195 of the Criminal Code were only based on the testimony of witnesses who were subordinate to K.A.G. The witnesses did not possess any credible information. Given the conclusions of the defense, the criminal case was dismissed due to a lack of evidence.